Nothing changed for this peer review. I'm glad we used Google Docs again, but nothing was significantly different in how we went about it.
I recieved helpful comments from one of my group members, and none from the other. Maybe she will put some comments up tonight, but as of this morning there were none.
I do see some repeating patterns in the responses I recieved. For one I need to be a little more clear on connecting my "creations" to the readings. Also, I should work more on creating a stronger introductions and conclusions. My introductions thus far have been "filler". This is probably because it's a rough draft, but I definitely should be taking more time to complete these assigments. I wish I had that time. I'm not going to complain but I've been pretty busy with all my other classes and this is the balance I've found.
What I've learned...
We are all capable of successful peer reviewing. Unfortunately, some refuse to take it as seriously as others. One of my fellow classmates feels that since these papers are online he instintively "scims" them. This blocks a successful peer review. Personally, I don't see any problem with them being online and I've enjoyed learning how to use Google docs and Wiki.
All-in-all our peer review processes could have been much better, but they did work. It's awesome to have a tool like Google Docs, but if your reviewing with pen and paper I think it's easier to see mistakes. Besides, it much more fun to mark up a page then to type some words.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment